A Monster hides in our Galactic Centre

admin — Tue, 24 Aug 2010 05:24:55 +0000

Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik

- Infrared/Submillimeter Astronomy -

Galactic Center Research

MPE Infrared Astronomy Research Galactic Center

Galactic Center
People
Observations
Results
Publications
Links

3D Animation of some stars orbiting the central black hole. This animation has been created using the free space simulation Celestia.

The central region of our Milky Way is an extremely interesting and fascinating field of research. Within few light years we find here ten thousands of stars forming a dense cluster, and the geometric centre of our Galaxy harbours a supermassive black hole with around 3.6 million solar masses. Due to its relative proximity of around 8 kiloparsecs, the Galactic Centre is a perfect laboratory to examine the physical processes in a galactic nucleus.

Our primary goals are to uncover

the physical properties of the central supermassive black hole
when and where the stars were born
the nature of these stars
the dynamics in this region

Time resolved astrometry over a time span of now 17 years allows a description of the proper motions of the Galactic Centre stars. The observations clearly show, that some stars in the immediate vicinity of Sgr A* – i.e. in distances up to around 30 light days – move on Keplerian orbits around the central mass. From the shape of these orbits, the mass of Sgr A* and its distance from the Earth can be calculated.

A HKL colour composite of the Galactic Centre region

In order to achieve this, we have observed the central parsec of the galactic center in near infrared wavelengths since 1992. The main instruments are:
- the adaptive optics assisted NIR-camera NAOS/CONICA at the VLT on Cerro Paranal, Chile, performing H, K and L imaging
- the imaging spectrograph SINFONI, also located at the VLT on Cerro Paranal, Chile
- the Laser Guide Star Facility at the VLT
- until 2002 we used the Speckle-Camera SHARP I on the NTT located at La Silla, Chile
All facilities are operated by the European Southern Observatory (ESO).

Time sequence of a flaring event

Since the first near-infrared high-resolution observations of the galactic centre in the beginning of the 1990s, the GC was regularly monitored. However, in spite of all efforts, no unambiguous NIR counterpart of SgrA* could be detected up to 2003. On the 9th of May, during routine observations of the GC star cluster at 1.7 microns with NAOS/CONICA at the VLT, we witnessed a powerful flare at the location of the black hole. Within a few minutes, the flux of a faint source increased by a factor of 5-6 and fainted again after about 30 min. The flare was found to have happened within a few milli-arcseconds of the position of Sgr A*. The short rise-and-decay times told us that the source of the flare was located within less than 10 Schwarzschild radii of the black hole.

The Laser Guide Star of the VLT pointing at the Galactic Centre. Image courtesy Yuri Beletsky

How we appear from 183,000,000 ks

admin — Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:43:19 +0000

A NASA Discovery mission to conduct the first orbital study of the innermost planet

Why Mercury?
The Mission
Gallery
Education
News Center
Science Operations
Who We Are
FAQs
Related Links
Contacts
Home

< Back to Gallery Main Page

Click on image to enlarge.

Earth and Moon from 114 Million Miles

Release Date: August 17, 2010

Topics: Earth, Stars, WAC

Date Acquired: May 6, 2010
Image Mission Elapsed Time (MET): 181616382
Instrument: Wide Angle Camera (WAC) of the Mercury Dual Imaging System (MDIS)
WAC Filter: 2 (clear filter)
Field of View: The WAC has a 10.5° field of view
Of Interest: In the lower left portion of this image, the Earth can be seen, as well as the much smaller Moon to Earth’s right. When MESSENGER took this image, a distance of 183 million kilometers (114 million miles) separated the spacecraft and Earth. To provide context for this distance, the average separation between the Earth and the Sun is about 150 million kilometers (93 million miles). Though it is a beautiful, thought-provoking picture, viewing our planet from far away was not the main reason that the mission team planned the collection of this image. Instead, this image was acquired as part of MESSENGER’s campaign to search for vulcanoids, small rocky objects that have been postulated to exist in orbits between Mercury and the Sun. Though no vulcanoids have yet been detected, the MESSENGER spacecraft is in a unique position to look for smaller and fainter vulcanoids than has ever before been possible. MESSENGER’s vulcanoid searches occur near perihelion passages, when the spacecraft’s orbit brings it closest to the Sun. Today is another such perihelion, and MESSENGER is taking a new set of images to search for tiny asteroids lurking close to the Sun.

Credit: NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Carnegie Institution of Washington

For information regarding the use of MESSENGER images, see the image use policy

Japanese Space Probe images Venus

admin — Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:09:16 +0000

Header

Search SiteGo!

NASA Science: Science News

Home → Science News → Science@NASA Headline News → 2010 → Japanese Spacecraft Approaches Venus

Japanese Spacecraft Approaches Venus

Play Audio
Download Audio
Join Mailing List

August 16, 2010: For the next few months, Venus will be softly resplendent in the evening sky, a treat for stargazers – but looks can be deceiving.

"Evening Star." Venus shines over Costa da Caparica, Portugal. Credit: Miguel Claro.

Consider this: The Venusian surface is hot enough to melt lead. The planet’s 96% carbon dioxide atmosphere is thick and steamy with a corrosive mist of sulfuric acid floating through it. The terrain is forbidding, strewn with craters and volcanic calderas – and bone dry.

Takeshi Imamura can’t wait to get there.

Imamura is the project scientist for Akatsuki, a Japanese mission also called the Venus Climate Orbiter. The spacecraft is approaching Venus and will enter orbit on December 7, 2010. Imamura believes a close-up look at Venus could teach us a lot about our own planet.

"In so many ways, Venus is similar to Earth. It has about the same mass, is approximately the same distance from the sun, and is made of the same basic materials," says Imamura. "Yet the two worlds ended up so different. We want to know why."

Although a parade of U.S. and Soviet spacecraft has visited Venus since 1961, no one yet knows how it became Earth’s "evil twin." Did it suffer from a case of global warming run amok – or something else? When Akatsuki reaches Venus in December, it will begin to solve some of the mysteries hidden in the thick Venusian atmosphere.

"By comparing Venus’s unique meteorology to Earth’s, we’ll learn more about the universal principles of meteorology and improve the climate models we use to predict our planet’s future."

Particularly puzzling is Venus’s "super-rotation." Fierce, blistering winds propel an atmosphere filled with storms and sulfuric acid clouds in a churning maelstrom around Venus at over 220 miles per hour, 60 times faster than the planet itself rotates.

The acid clouds of Venus, photographed by the ESA’s Venus Express spacecraft. [more]

"Venus’s atmosphere is in perpetual motion, as if a living thing," says Imamura.

Within this swirling cauldron are other Venusian riddles to be solved: What is the origin of the 12-mile thick layer of sulfuric acid clouds that shrouds the planet? And how does Venus’ lightning crackle through this strange brew?

Akatsuki, bristling with cameras, will circle the exotic planet’s equator in an elliptical orbit for at least 2 years, monitoring the atmosphere at different altitudes using various wavelengths (IR, UV, and visible). With this data and data from the spacecraft’s radio dish, scientists will reconstruct a 3D model of the atmosphere’s structure and dynamics.

An artist’s concept of Akatsuki at Venus. Credit: Akihiro Ikeshita

"The spacecraft’s orbit will match the circulation of Venus’s clouds, allowing the instruments to monitor cloud movement from directly above for 20 hours at a time. We’ll assemble the images to produce a cloud motion time-lapse movie, much like a weather forecaster on television might show you of Earth."

The instruments will also scrutinize the planet’s surface for volcanic activity that could be contributing to the sulfur contents of the atmosphere. "If any active volcanoes are spouting hot lava on Venus, one of our infrared cameras will detect the thermal emission," says Imamura.

In addition, Akatsuki’s Lightning and Airglow Camera will hunt for lightning in order to settle a longstanding debate. "On Earth, the standard theory of lightning requires water ice particles on which positive or negative charges are induced via collisions," explains Imamura. "But there are no ice particles in Venus’s hot, dry atmosphere–so how does Venusian lightning get started? It may be that charge separation can occur in sulfuric acid clouds–or perhaps some unknown solid particles exist in the atmosphere and play an important role."

Imamura can scarcely contain his curiosity. "As a young boy I loved to watch clouds, stars, oceans, rocks, and creatures. I wanted to understand why they look and behave as they do. Now I am curious in the same way about Venus. Nature is so full of mysteries!"

Beginning in December, some of Venus’s mysteries will be revealed. Stay tuned.

Author: Dauna Coulter | Editor: Dr. Tony Phillips | Credit: Science@NASA

More Information

Venus Climate Orbiter (Akatsuki) — JAXA home page

Akatsuki is the Japanese word for "dawn."

The European Space Agency’s Venus Express is already circling Venus in a polar orbit, performing a global investigation of the Venusian atmosphere and of the plasma environment. This spacecraft is using spectrometers to examine the atmosphere’s chemistry. "Together, these two spacecraft will yield more information than either spacecraft could produce alone," says Imamura. "For example, we’ll be able to trace the circulations of chemicals in Venus’s atmosphere that determine its chemical state."

Science News

Science@NASA Headline News
- 2010
  - Planets Align for the Perseid Meteor Shower
  - Spacequakes Rumble Near Earth
- 2009
- 2008
- 2007
- 2006
- 2005
- 2004
- 2003
- 2002
- 2001
- 2000
- 1999
- 1998
- 1997
- 1996
News & Features
Press Releases
RSS Feeds

National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA Official: Ruth Netting
Send us your comments!
Last Updated: Aug. 16, 2010

A massive Solar Ejection

admin — Mon, 02 Aug 2010 23:24:21 +0000

Click to launch a movie (EUV 304 Å)

Website news and trials

admin — Sun, 01 Aug 2010 02:09:46 +0000

As ever, our website is expanding with new features. We have made a couple of changes, which are not necessarily permanent, but may help site visitors navigate our site more easily.

1. The new articles are found on the “landing” page of the site http://skyofplenty.com . We have a small issue, in that, the page marked “Latest News” now says nothing! This is a coding issue and I am working to recode the site so that this page has articles on it rather than nothing! If you wish to see the articles you will need to go to http://skyofplenty.com , while I write a coding solution!

2. The “landing page” of the site has changed from “Home” to ”Latest News”. It was felt that new astronomical information was being missed by our visitors. The “Home” page still contains all the society information for visits and bookings.

3. The “Latest News” page, was becoming very long, due to the hard work of Norm submitting interesting articles and links , we are trialling the use of an article archive which lists older articles, news and information. The article archive can be found on the top nav bar and it is, obviously, called “Articles”.

NB I was a little too swift with the software which creates the archive and have managed to put all the articles (even the recent ones) onto the Article page…. whoops!! This page will have articles back on it as and when they are posted by Norm and the society. I am afraid it was a case of too much fiddling and not enough foresight. Many apologies!

If you have any comments about the website and any proposed changes please contact Norm and he will pass them onto me.

Thanks

Victoria

Hubble’s Contribution to Scientific Knowledge

admin — Sun, 25 Jul 2010 04:58:57 +0000

The hubble telescope has opened mankind’s eyes to the knowledge of . . . → Read More: Hubble’s Contribution to Scientific Knowledge

New discoveries about our outer atmosphere.

admin — Thu, 15 Jul 2010 23:22:36 +0000

. . . → Read More: New discoveries about our outer atmosphere.

How computer control of the Shuttles has evolved.

admin — Sun, 11 Jul 2010 07:29:51 +0000

Text Size

Grow Text Size Shrink Text Size

Shuttle Computers Navigate Record of Reliability

06.28.10

At 64 pounds, the shuttle’s general purpose computers are heavier than several modern desktop machines combined. However, they can operate for years without failing, a reliability mark that is no accident. Engineers spend months making sure any change to a computer or its software is tested repeatedly. Photo credit: NASA
› View Larger Image
The shuttle GPCs were upgraded in 1991, and the system that used to take two boxes, right, could run on one, left. Photo credit: NASA
› View Larger Image
STS-132 Commander Ken Ham works with the keypad that is connected to the shuttle’s primary avionics system. The GPCs operate in several formats to fly the shuttle, including the phases of on-orbit operations. Photo credit: NASA
› View Larger Image
Laptops are set up to help astronauts in space with several tasks that demand anything from geographic representations of Earth and spacecraft for rendezvous operations to word processing and email. Here, STS-125 Commander Scott Altman works on the flight deck near two laptops that were set up. Photo credit: NASA.
› View Larger Image Astronaut Scott Horowitz uses an early laptop to run a landing simulator program called PILOT. Photo credit: NASA.
› View Larger Image The space shuttle’s five general purpose computers computers, or GPCs, are slow and have little memory compared to modern home computers. On the other hand, no one straps the latest-and-greatest desktop computer inside a machine that vibrates like an old truck on a washboard road while requiring it to get a spacecraft into orbit and back safely.
In other words, when it comes to flying the shuttle, reliability means far more than performance.
"The environment of space is very harsh and unfriendly and not just space, but getting into space," said Roscoe Ferguson, a space shuttle flight software operating system engineer for the United Space Alliance. "Something like a desktop might not even survive all the vibration. Then once you get into space you have the radiation."
Even after a major computer upgrade in 1991, the primary flight system has a storage capacity of one megabyte and runs at a speed of 1.4 million instructions per second. While this was more memory and much faster computing speed than could be achieved with the original 1970s-era Shuttle flight computers, it doesn’t compare to today’s desktop computers.
"The GPCs serve as the brains of the space shuttle," Ferguson said. "It’s really the heart of the control system."
The GPCs include 24 input/output links that collect the signals from the shuttle’s myriad sensors and sends them to the GPCs. The computers plug the readings from the sensors into elaborate mathematical algorithms to determine when to swivel the three main engines during launch, how much to move the elevons on the wings for landing and which thrusters to fire in space to set up a rendezvous with the International Space Station, for example. That process is completed about 25 times every second.
The shuttle’s computer-driven flight control system was a first for a production spacecraft. The fly-by-wire design, tested on modified research aircraft, does not have any mechanical links from the pilot to the control surfaces and thrusters. Instead, the pilot moves the control stick in the cockpit and the computers transmit signals to the control mechanisms to make them move.
The shuttle system is so dependent on computers that a fraction of a second without them could be catastrophic during the critical parts of flight.
"We have a range where if you can’t control the vehicle for 120 milliseconds, you could lose the vehicle," said Andrew Klausman, the United Space Alliance technical manager for the backup flight system and multifunction electronic display subsystem. He’s been working with the shuttle computers since 1986.
That’s why engineers put so much time into testing and improving the system. A software change typically goes through about nine months of in-house simulator testing and then another six months of testing in a unique NASA lab before it is accepted for flight. The results of the strenuous testing regimen? Well, it has been 24 years since the last time a software problem required an on-orbit fix during a mission. In the last 12 years, only three software errors have appeared during a flight. But perhaps the most meaningful statistic is that a software error has never endangered the crew, shuttle or a mission’s success.
"The current quality of this software system is really almost unimaginable," said USA’s Jim Orr, who has been working with the shuttle’s computer systems and software in different positions since 1978. "It’s that good."
The networked computers are set up so that four are operational and one is a backup that could fly the launch and entry if the others failed. The computers receive their information from a host of sensors and actuators throughout the orbiter, external fuel tank and solid rocket boosters.
It sounds like a lot of work for any electronic device, let alone ones that are running on far less memory than a cell phone. And keep in mind that the first few dozen shuttle missions used the first-generation GPCs, which boasted memory capacities of 416 kilobytes and were a third as fast. They also weighed twice as much and it took two boxes to do the job of one of today’s GPCs.
That’s where the software comes in.
Just like the computers themselves, the software code involved is much smaller than modern commercial counterparts. The shuttle’s primary flight software contains about 400,000 lines of code. For comparison, a Windows operating system package includes millions of lines of source code.
"From a complexity point of view, Microsoft Windows is probably more complex because it has to do so very, very, very much," Orr said.
Shuttle programmers, on the other hand, focus solely on what the software must do for a mission to succeed. The machines simply don’t have the room to support programming for other things.
"There are a lot of things that have to happen very precisely," Orr said.
Plus, shuttle software is written to successfully adjust to failures, such as when one main engine shut down early during the launch of the STS-51F mission in 1985. The software steered the shuttle safely into a lower-than-planned orbit and the Spacelab research mission still was successful. The computers also operated the shuttle safely during the launch of Columbia’s STS-93 mission in 1999, when an electrical short in a main engine controller and a pinhole leak in a main engine occurred during ascent.
A single shuttle flight requires a series of software sets to operate at different times on the computers. There are overlays for pre-launch, launch, in-orbit operations, in-orbit checkout and entry.
"Ascent is certainly the most challenging," Orr said. "There is some really critical timing at main engine cutoff to close the propellant valves at just the right times to manage the engine shutdown and if some of those valve closures don’t occur at the right time, you could get a catastrophic failure."
Although shuttle designers anticipated the importance of computers to the spacecraft, the GPC memory size limitations were a major hurdle before the first mission. After all, that was the first time anyone tried to program a system that could accurately guide the largest manned spacecraft ever built into orbit and back safely.
"Getting to STS-1 was just this huge, huge challenge with a large amount of code," Orr said. "You had the constraints of the CPU and memory, you had a lot of new technology. You had to integrate that into the vehicles and make all that stuff work together."
"The flight software that was done back in the 70s was very complex," Ferguson said. "They went and analyzed the concepts and the algorithms and everything that was required to fly the vehicle, the physics and things related to that. And once that was taken up, you had the developers come in and implement those in the actual programming language."
After the shuttle began flying, software adjustments were difficult to make without going over the memory limit.
Before the GPCs were upgraded in 1991, "You literally had to remove something or code something more efficiently in order to add anything," Orr said.
The shuttle computers went through a modernization effort that increased the capacity to the current 1 megabyte and let designers include more features. Later on a modern "glass cockpit" replaced the original mechanical dials and readouts with electronic screens which astronauts could dial through for the information they needed at the moment.
But still, there was no room for extras, and programmers work within strict limits.
"If (the Shuttle) had come along later, it would have had a lot more memory that we would have tried to fill" Klausman said. "It actually turns out to be the right amount of memory to fly the shuttle with all the necessary capability."
Although the GPCs run the spacecraft during a mission, astronauts take a number of relatively modern computers with them into orbit in the form of laptops. Crews carry modified IBM ThinkPad A31p computers into space with them and use them for rendezvous assistance, entry and landing simulations and e-mailing Earth.
The laptops also are much faster than the GPCs and connect with devices not available to the GPCs. The Thinkpads use one of these connections to relay photos of the external tank falling away after launch to mission control at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston.
But that modernity has a trade-off: the laptops are not nearly as reliable as the GPCs due to radiation effects and use of less critical commercial off-the-shelf software, Klausman said.
The laptops, however, don’t work on life-support or high-criticality systems that require the reliability found in the GPCs.
"For critical operations, I can’t come anywhere close to that reliability with the laptops," Klausman said. "They are wonderful items, but they are susceptible to radiation particles, they are susceptible to badly written software. I could put five laptops on board and all five would suffer radiation upsets within the first day."
With a ThinkPad 760XD laptop, two to three memory changes due to radiation occur during a shuttle flight to the Station, Klausman said. That number balloons up to 30 for a mission to NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope. The reason is that Hubble orbits about 150 miles higher than the station, where the radiation protection from Earth’s magnetic field is not as strong.
Designers also found out that laptops would crash when the shuttle passes through the "South Atlantic Anomaly," which is an area where the magnetic field draws in to Earth, again offering less radiation filtering for spacecraft flying through it.
The GPCs don’t crash for radiation concerns because the GPC hardware includes a memory scrubber that prevents the system from reading radiation-changed memory.
While the GPCs are well-regarded for handling navigation and control duties, they are not set up for performance-intensive work such as complex graphical displays and word processing. That’s why the astronauts started carrying fold-up computers originally made by GRiD into space.
"Back in the GRiD days, the idea was to include something that the little payloads could use," Klausman said. Since then, astronauts outlined new needs for the computers and NASA began using more-powerful Thinkpads and developing modifications and custom software.
For example, the laptops run a program that shows the crew where they are in space to help them navigate to the space station and dock. "They get a graphical display of where they are and where their orbit will take them if they do nothing," Klausman said.
A day or two before landing, the shuttle commander uses a laptop and a custom controller to run a landing simulation program.
Klausman points to the first launch of a Thinkpad in December 1993 as a highlight of his career. The laptops were aboard Endeavour for the first repair mission to NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope.
"The STS-61 launch where we had worked really hard for a couple years to get the ThinkPads ready for flight and to actually be there and see them go was . . . wow."
The designers also continue to experiment with different ways to incorporate the proven shuttle flight instructions into modern equipment. For example, Ferguson said engineers were able to load all of the shuttle’s GPC software onto a computer chip weighing only a couple ounces and found out the software still worked.
Such innovations are expected to play a large role in any future spacecraft, so software engineers continue to make adjustments to shuttle programs with an eye on seeing them incorporated in coming designs.

Steven Siceloff
NASA’s John F. Kennedy Space Center

Twinkle Twinkle Little Star!

admin — Thu, 08 Jul 2010 08:25:23 +0000

How I wonder what you are? Click here to find out. The Sun as a Star

Close ups of the Moon

admin — Thu, 24 Jun 2010 03:17:57 +0000

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/first-year.html